Comments for gefira blog

Comment on A short story of a failed installation (WebSphere Message Broker on Ubuntu) by Alexander

Alexander — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:21:05 +0000

forgot to mention, I’ve installed 64bit Message Broker on 64bit Ubuntu

Comment on A short story of a failed installation (WebSphere Message Broker on Ubuntu) by Alexander

Alexander — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:19:53 +0000

hi Andy/Dariusz,
i have successfuly launched Message Broker 7.0 on ubuntu 11.10. the only thing i’ve missed was the ksh which was required to populate some files into /var/mqsi directory.
i hope, this will be useful.

Comment on WebSphere MQ and Ubuntu HOWTO by Ashutosh

Ashutosh — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:47:48 +0000

While installing MQ Client using mqc7_7.0.1.7_linuxp.tar.gz file . i was having issue in accepting license. It was keep throwing following error

./mqlicense.sh: 115: [[: not found

Displaying license agreement on :0
./lap/jre/jre/bin/java: 1: Syntax error: “(” unexpected

Actually this error was due the jre provided with this MQ Client distribution. so followed the option mentioned below and used the JRE installed in my machine.

sudo bash ./mqlicense.sh -accept -jre /home/singha7/dev/jdk/jdk1.6.0_29/jre/bin/java

it worked for me.

Comment on WebSphere MQ and Ubuntu HOWTO by jmk

jmk — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:09:48 +0000

If you want to run MQ Explorer you have to do it as the logged on user (ie you can not su to mqm and run MQE)

I had some problems creating Objects with my user in MQE (not mqm, adding my user to the mqm group did not work either… a bit rusty on both Linux and WMQ admin I admit)

Loggin on as ´mqm´and running MQE works fine.

Comment on advWhy prnI vDon’t vLike daThe adjHungarian nNotation by Dariusz Suchojad

Dariusz Suchojad — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:50:23 +0000

Hungarian is a lovely language actually! Even more difficult than Polish is but I really like it.

Comment on advWhy prnI vDon’t vLike daThe adjHungarian nNotation by Rafał Dowgird

Rafał Dowgird — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:22:09 +0000

Ouch. The article reads like Hungarian indeed. How about a link to a plain English version?

Comment on advWhy prnI vDon’t vLike daThe adjHungarian nNotation by Dariusz Suchojad

Dariusz Suchojad — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:26:50 +0000

@Greg Aaah.. this is good read indeed. And even kind of confirms my point that there's no real issue with using 'idx' or 'uq', only the types are problematic.

Comment on advWhy prnI vDon’t vLike daThe adjHungarian nNotation by Greg

Greg — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:19:52 +0000

You should read http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Wrong.html. It shows the history of Hungarian notation, and how the original creator of it was right, but someone else messed it up and wrecked the idea of Hungarian.

Comment on Sort of tired of long constant names – Bunch to the rescue! by Dariusz Suchojad

Dariusz Suchojad — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:47:31 +0000

@Steve Ferg

Thanks for the links Steve, these look truly idiomatic in the general case, fully agreed.

Only that in my particular case it’s still not that handy when there’s a need for frequently iterating over the constants.

Cheers!

Comment on Sort of tired of long constant names – Bunch to the rescue! by Dariusz Suchojad

Dariusz Suchojad — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:40:33 +0000

@Joe

> I did not know about Bunch, so thanks for the article.

Sure thing Joe, the little class is really useful, give it a try!

> This indicates a rookie IMHO.

Heh, to each his own I’d say. I see no sign of rookieness in that